Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SCHAIBLE, APPELLEE v. CITY OF CINCINNATI, APPELLANT.

Appeal — Order granting motion for new trial — No abuse of discretion — No judgment or final order.

Per Curiam.

Since the journal entry of the trial court setting aside the verdict and judgment and granting a new trial does not disclose the ground or grounds for such order, and an examination of the record fails to disclose an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in making the order, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. See Schwer, Admx., v. New York, Chicago St. Louis Rd. Co., 156 Ohio St. 115, 100 N.E.2d 197, and Green v. Acacia Mutual Life ins. Co., 156 Ohio St. 1, 100 N.E.2d 211.

Judgment affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCHAIBLE v. CINCINNATI
(May 14, 1952)