Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Richard W. Gordon, director of law, for appellant city of Columbus. Mr. Roy E. Browne, director of law, and Mr. John R. White, for appellant city of Akron. Mr. Herbert A. Beane, city attorney, and Mr. Maurice J. Gilbert, for appellant city of Dayton. Mr. Robert P. Wilson, city solicitor, for appellant city of Canton. Mr. Joseph H. Crowley, director of law, and Mr. Robert M. Morgan, for appellant city of Cleveland. Mr. John McCarthy, director of law, for appellant city of Toledo. Mr. C. William O'Neill, attorney general, and Mr. John P. Case, for appellee Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Mr. Ashley M. Van Duzer, Mr. Carlyle Tresise, Mr. Thomas V. Koykka, Mr. Raymond H. Treffinger, Mr. George C. McConnaughey and Mr. Latham W. Murfey, Jr., for appellee The Ohio Bell Telephone Company.
Judges
  • Per Curiam.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Richard W. Gordon, director of law, for appellant city of Columbus. Mr. Roy E. Browne, director of law, and Mr. John R. White, for appellant city of Akron. Mr. Herbert A. Beane, city attorney, and Mr. Maurice J. Gilbert, for appellant city of Dayton. Mr. Robert P. Wilson, city solicitor, for appellant city of Canton. Mr. Joseph H. Crowley, director of law, and Mr. Robert M. Morgan, for appellant city of Cleveland. Mr. John McCarthy, director of law, for appellant city of Toledo. Mr. C. William O'Neill, attorney general, and Mr. John P. Case, for appellee Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Mr. Ashley M. Van Duzer, Mr. Carlyle Tresise, Mr. Thomas V. Koykka, Mr. Raymond H. Treffinger, Mr. George C. McConnaughey and Mr. Latham W. Murfey, Jr., for appellee The Ohio Bell Telephone Company.
Judges
  • Per Curiam.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

CITY OF COLUMBUS ET AL., APPELLANTS v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

Public Utilities Commission — Telephone companies — Rates — Rate base — Depreciation reserve account in excess of accrued depreciation — Not included in rate base, when — Funds invested in additional property — Property used in interstate commerce.

Per Curiam.

This court is of the opinion that the findings and the order of the commission are supported by the record. The order is not unreasonable or unlawful, and is affirmed.

Order affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MIDDLETON, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.

TAFT, J., not participating.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

COLUMBUS v. P.U.C
(Jun 18, 1952)