Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

TRUEMAN FERTILIZER CO. v. STEIN.

MATHEWS, Justice.

After an appeal was perfected in this case, the appellee filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the appeal is not prosecuted from a final judgment, and also a motion to strike the brief filed by the appellant because of an alleged failure to comply with 30 F.S.A. Common Law Rule 20. There is no merit in either of said motions, and each is denied.

We have carefully considered the record and the briefs and oral argument on the merits of the case and do not find any reversible error. The matters presented have heretofore been adjudicated and determined in the following cases: Trueman Fertilizer Co., v. Stein, 157 Fla. 769, 26 So.2d 893; Trueman Fertilizer Co. v. Stein, 159 Fla. 131, 30 So.2d 548; Trueman Fertilizer Co. v. Stein, 160 Fla. 787, 36 So.2d 449.

Affirmed.

SEBRING, C.J., ROBERTS, J., and REVELS, Associate Justice, concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TRUEMAN FERTILIZER CO. v. STEIN
(Jun 26, 1952)