Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

RUTH SWETLOW et al., Respondents, v. ZINDOREST PARK, INC., Appellant.

Per Curiam.

While the direction of a verdict for plaintiffs as matter of law was proper (General Business Law, § 201) the issue of damages was for the jury.

The judgment should be modified by directing judgments for plaintiffs and remitting the case to the court below for the assessment of damages, with costs.

HAMMER, HOFSTADTER and SCHREIBER, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SWETLOW v. ZINDOREST PARK
(Jul 2, 1952)