Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Zoning ordinance — Residence prohibited on lot not fronting on dedicated street — Or public highway — Not substantially related to public safety, health or welfare — Owner deprived of beneficial use of property — Inalienable rights — Section 1, Article I, Constitution — Inviolability of property — Section 19, Article I, Constitution.
Per Curiam.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.