Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ANTHONY R. DeMARCO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. FRANCIS ESTLOW, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Haneman in his opinion filed in the Chancery Division and reported in 18 N.J. Super. 30.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DeMARCO v. ESTLOW
(Sep 22, 1952)