Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • William Lee, pro se, submitted on the
  • Charles M. Irelan, U.S.
  • , Arthur J. McLaughlin, Joseph M. Howard
  • Lewis A. Carroll,
  • U.S.
  • , Washington, D.C., submitted on the brief for
  • George Morris Fay, U.S.
  • , Washington, D.C., at time record was filed,
  • Joseph F. Goetten,
  • U.S.
  • , Washington, D.C., at time record was filed, also entered appearances for
Judges
  • Elijah Barrett Prettyman
  • James McPherson Proctor
  • David L. Bazelon
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • William Lee, pro se, submitted on the
  • Charles M. Irelan, U.S.
  • , Arthur J. McLaughlin, Joseph M. Howard
  • Lewis A. Carroll,
  • U.S.
  • , Washington, D.C., submitted on the brief for
  • George Morris Fay, U.S.
  • , Washington, D.C., at time record was filed,
  • Joseph F. Goetten,
  • U.S.
  • , Washington, D.C., at time record was filed, also entered appearances for
Judges
  • Elijah Barrett Prettyman
  • James McPherson Proctor
  • David L. Bazelon
See more information ...
Smart Summary

LEE v. UNITED STATES.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment of convicton and sentence, following a jury trial, upon an indictment in two counts charging carnal knowledge and incest of the fifteen year old daughter of appellant. Many errors are assigned.

D.C. Code 1951, § 22-2801.

D.C. Code 1951, § 22-1901.

A careful review of the entire record discloses no prejudicial error. The evidence of guilt is strong and convincing, and leaves no room for reasonable doubt.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

LEE v. UNITED STATES
(Nov 6, 1952)