Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BROWN et al. v. MAYFIELD.

McINNIS, Judge.

This is a suit for a declaratory judgment in favor decreeing them to be the owners of 1/4 interest in the oil, gas and other minerals underlying certain lands in the Haynesville field in Claiborne Parish.

Judgment was rendered and signed in the district court in favor of plaintiffs.

Defendant appeals suspensively and devolutively to this court.

The record is bare of any proof of the value of the mineral interest in contest. In the minutes of court is incorporated the following stipulation: "It is stipulated by counsel for both plaintiffs and defendant that the property involved in this suit is worth more than $100.00 but less than $2,000.00."

Our appreciation of the law is that jurisdiction for purposes of appeal cannot be conferred by agreement of the parties. Martin v. Carroll, 220 La. 481, 56 So.2d 843; Tucker v. Woodside, 218 La. 708, 50 So.2d 814 and cases cited.

For these reasons this cause is remanded to the district court for the purpose of taking evidence as to the value of the mineral interest in contest. Costs of this appeal to be equally divided between plaintiffs and defendant, taxing other costs to await final determination of the controversy.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BROWN v. MAYFIELD
(Oct 31, 1952)