Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

BLACKMAN, APPELLANT v. BOARD OF LIQUOR CONTROL, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Intoxicating liquor — Board of Liquor Control — Authority to establish minimum selling price of wine — Section 6064-3a, General Code — Delegation of power not unlawful, when — Standards and rules for guidance of delegatee — Necessity for — Where delegated power relates to public health, safety, morals or welfare — Fixing price of wine as a police regulation — Statutory construction — Meaning of words, "may" and "shall," — Price fixing — Investiture of legislative power — Section 1, Article II, Constitution.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BLACKMAN v. BOARD OF LIQUOR CONTROL
(Dec 10, 1952)