WERBEL v. MULLEN | N.J. | Judgment | Law | CaseMine

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem

AMICUS AI

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Paul C. Kemeny argued the cause for the appellant. Mr. Milton Lowenstein argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. Sidney K. Werbel, attorney).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Paul C. Kemeny argued the cause for the appellant. Mr. Milton Lowenstein argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. Sidney K. Werbel, attorney).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

ELEANOR S. WERBEL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BELLE MULLEN,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam filed in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments