AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In re JOSEPH TANNENBAUM, on Habeas Corpus. In re CARL E. BROWN, on Habeas Corpus. JOSEPH TANNENBAUM, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent. CARL E. BROWN, Petitioner,

THE COURT.

The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.

The court is of the opinion that the rule of People v. Talle, 111 Cal.App.2d 650 [ 245 P.2d 633], applying Statutes of 1871, page 319, was not here violated. (See, generally, In re Lemon, 15 Cal.App.2d 82 [ 59 P.2d 213]; United States v. Price, 163 F. 904.) [1] We are further of the view that the testimony of an accomplice is sufficient upon which to indict as it is to hold to answer. ( People v. McRae, 31 Cal.2d 184 [ 187 P.2d 741].) The other points raised do not necessitate discussion. The petitions for writs of prohibition are denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE TANNENBAUM
(Jan 16, 1953)