Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CHAPMAN v. GILES et al. (two cases.)

HEAD, Justice.

The plaintiff, as legal guardian of a minor, sought to have an action, brought by the defendants as next friend of the minor, amended so as to proceed with the plaintiff as the representative and guardian of the minor. To an order denying the relief sought the plaintiff excepted. Over certain objections of the plaintiff, the trial court admitted in evidence an "appeal" from an alleged order appointing the plaintiff as guardian, and this ruling is assigned as error. Held:

None of the rulings or orders assigned as error is in a proceeding or cause within the jurisdiction of this court as fixed by the Constitution, art. 6, sec. 2, par. 4 (Code, Ann., § 2-3704). Compare Campbell v. Atlanta Coach Co., 186 Ga. 77 ( 196 S.E. 796).

Transferred to the Court of Appeals. All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, P. J., not participating.

Nos. 18069, 18070. SUBMITTED JANUARY 13, 1953 — DECIDED JANUARY 15, 1953.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CHAPMAN v. GILES
(Jan 15, 1953)