Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF SEITZ.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Guardian and ward — Proceeding to terminate guardianship — Bond — Necessity for two personal sureties — Section 10506-5, General Code — Bond signed by guardian as principal and one personal surety — Ample security provided — Guardian's appointment not void — Necessity for continuation of guardianship.

Per Curiam.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN and STEWART, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE SEITZ
(Jan 28, 1953)