AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

FRANK LATORRE, Respondent, v. PEPSI COLA METROPOLITAN BOTTLING CO., INC., Appellant.

Per Curiam.

A party securing a discovery and inspection is not required to furnish a copy of his own expert's report to his adversary. ( Glichenhouse v. Pepsi-Cola, N.Y.L.J., Aug. 6, 1942, p. 288, col. 1; Hanover v. Kelly Dry Ginger Ale, N.Y.L.J., Nov. 2, 1944, p. 1152, col. 2.)

The order should be unanimously modified upon the law by striking therefrom the provision requiring defendant to furnish a copy of the report of the discovery and inspection to plaintiff's attorney and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The inspection shall proceed on March 25, 1953, at 10:30 A.M., at the place fixed in the order or at such other time and place to which the parties may stipulate.

WALSH, CUFF and UGHETTA, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LATORRE v. PEPSI COLA METROPOLITAN BOTTLING
(Mar 12, 1953)