Supreme Court — Dismissal sua sponte — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Failure to stop after accident — "Due to" operation of motor vehicle on highway — Section 12606, General Code — Sufficiency of affidavit — Averment that accused "involved" in accident sufficient, when — Accused adequately apprised of offense — Words, "due to" and "involved," construed and defined.
It is ordered and adjudged, sua sponte, that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS, ZIMMERMAN and STEWART, JJ., concur.