Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Dipple v. Pittsburgh, Appellant.

Appeals — Timeliness — Quashing.

An appeal from an order of the court below which is not taken within three calendar months, as prescribed by statute, will be quashed by the appellate court of its own motion.

OPINION PER CURIAM, April 13, 1953:

The appeal in this case was not taken within three calendar months, as prescribed by statute, after the order of the court below was entered. Therefore, lacking jurisdiction, we are obliged to quash the appeal of our own motion, which we do the less reluctantly because of the satisfactory disposition by Judge MARSHALL, speaking for the court en banc, of the questions submitted to the court in the case stated.

Appeal quashed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DIPPLE v. PITTSBURGH
(Apr 13, 1953)