Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

PROCTOR v. KENNEDY ET UX.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing to the court that no appeal was taken from the final judgment in this case, but only from the order denying the motion for new trial, it is ordered ex mero motu, that the appeal be dismissed.

TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, THOMAS, and SEBRING, JJ., and PATTERSON, Associate Justice, concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PROCTOR v. KENNEDY
(Apr 21, 1953)