AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MacDONALD et al. v. MARTINELLI et al.

CONGER, District Judge.

The defendants moved at the pre-trial conference to amend their answer to plead the statute of limitations.

Since Judge Samuel H. Kaufman has held that Section 16(b) of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b), relating to the filing of consents, is inapplicable to this suit, D.C., 120 F. Supp. 383, the defendants are precluded from using the filing dates of such consents nevertheless filed as a basis for asserting the statute of limitations found in Sections 6 and 7 of the Portal to Portal Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 255, 256. The statute of limitations runs from the filing date of the complaint. Cf. Burrell v. LaFollette Coach Lines, D.C., 97 F. Supp. 279.

Motion denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MacDONALD v. MARTINELLI, (S.D.N.Y. 1953)
(May 22, 1953)