Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MILLER, APPELLEE v. SPICER MFG. CO. ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Workmen's compensation — Claim, not filed within two-year period, barred — Section 1465-72a, General Code.

Per Curiam.

It is apparent from the order of the Industrial Commission, quoted in plaintiff's petition, that the claim plaintiff is now presenting is for a new and distinct injury, for which no application for compensation was made within the two-year period prescribed by Section 1465-72 a, General Code.

The trial court was correct in sustaining the demurrer and rendering judgment for defendants. The reversal of that judgment by the Court of Appeals was error. State, ex rel. Bernhardt, v. Industrial Commission, 127 Ohio St. 582, 190 N.E. 224, approved and followed, and Kaiser v. Industrial Commission, 136 Ohio St. 440, 26 N.E.2d 449, overruled.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and that of the Court of Common Pleas affirmed.

Judgment reversed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN and STEWART, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MILLER v. MFG. CO
(Jun 3, 1953)