Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Sentence and parole — Powers of Pardon and Parole Commission discretionary — Parole a matter of grace — Not matter of right — Revocation of parole not a judicial process — Commission not required to grant hearing on revocation — Parole officer's knowledge of parole violation — Habeas corpus proceeding by parolee after revocation — Due process — Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN and STEWART, JJ., concur.