Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Ervan F. Kushner argued the cause for the appellant (
  • Brenman
  • Susser, attorneys). Mr. A. Leo Bohl
  • Mr. Forster W. Freeman, Jr., argued the cause for the respondents (
  • Freeman, Buttermore Freeman, Mr. Peter Hofstra
  • Mr. John A. Masiello, attorneys).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Ervan F. Kushner argued the cause for the appellant (
  • Brenman
  • Susser, attorneys). Mr. A. Leo Bohl
  • Mr. Forster W. Freeman, Jr., argued the cause for the respondents (
  • Freeman, Buttermore Freeman, Mr. Peter Hofstra
  • Mr. John A. Masiello, attorneys).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

GOTTHARD J. ZURCHER, TRADING AS GARAMOUNT MACHINE COMPANY, AND HARRY P.HALLER, AND PATERSON MACHINE CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION,PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. MODERN PLASTIC MACHINERY CORP., A CORPORATION OFTHE STATE OF DELAWARE LICENSED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Bigelow in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 6.

For reversal — Justice HEHER — 1.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

ZURCHER v. MODERN PLASTIC MACHINERY CORP
(Jun 15, 1953)