D'AMICO v. GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Verling C. Enteman argued the cause for the appellant (
McCarter, English Studer, attorneys
Mr. Stuart A. Young, Jr., of counsel). Mr. John A. Laird argued the cause for the respondent (
Roskein Laird, attorneys).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Verling C. Enteman argued the cause for the appellant (
McCarter, English Studer, attorneys
Mr. Stuart A. Young, Jr., of counsel). Mr. John A. Laird argued the cause for the respondent (
Roskein Laird, attorneys).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

PETER J. D'AMICO, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY,RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the court below.

BURLING, J., concurring in result.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 6.

For reversal — Justice OLIPHANT — 1.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.