Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

STATE, Plaintiff in error, vs. FRIEDRICH LOOTS COMPANY, Defendant in error.

The facts are similar to those in State v. Stang Tank Line (1953), ante, p. 570, 59 N.W.2d 800, decided this day. Defendant's truck was overloaded to an extent for which sec. 85.91(2b)(b), Stats., provided fines and penalties of $1,319. In its judgment the trial court imposed fines of $449.85, including costs, and "remitted" $875 poundage penalties.

BROWN, J.

The case is ruled by State v. Stang Tank Line, supra. Remission of all or part of a statutory penalty is beyond the trial court's discretion where no such power has been given it by the legislature. It is immaterial whether the court "remits" or "suspends" the penalty; the sentence is not authorized by law and is void.

By the Court. — Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with instructions to the trial court to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant for the penalty provided by sec. 85.91(2b)(b), Stats., conformably to this opinion and for further proceedings according to law.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. FRIEDRICH LOOTS CO
(Jul 3, 1953)