Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HAMMACK v. RESOLUTE FIRE INS. CO.

FOURNET, Chief Justice.

The motion of appellee, Resolute Insurance Company, to dismiss the appeal taken by appellant, George G. Hammack, Jr., from a judgment dismissing the latter's suit wherein he sought to recover against the former the principal sum of $2,353.19, plus statutory penalty of $463.30, and attorney fees of $400, is without merit, since the amount in dispute is clearly in excess of $2,000 and consequently this court has jurisdiction.

The argument that since the primary amount in dispute is the alleged value of an automobile destroyed by fire, $1,853.19, that figure should control the jurisdictional amount, because the penalty of $500 sought by appellant for breach of contract and the statutory penalty and attorney fees form no part of the amount sued for until the court finds the defendant-appellee at fault, and hence are not to be taken into consideration for the purpose of determining jurisdiction, is not supported by any cited authorities nor by logic or sound reason.

The motion to dismiss is denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HAMMACK v. RESOLUTE FIRE INS. CO
(Jul 3, 1953)