Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

KERFEL ET AL., APPELLANTS v. TRIMBACH, ADMX., ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Wills — Contest — Revocation — Accomplished, how — Section 10504-47, General Code — Act of obliteration and intent to revoke to be concurrent — Obliteration of single nondispositive clause — Inconclusive and insufficient to show intent, when — Will remained in possession of testator — Evidence — Not sufficient to go to jury, when — Directed verdict.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, HART, ZIMMERMAN and STEWART, JJ., concur.

MATTHIAS, J., not participating.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KERFEL v. TRIMBACH
(Oct 14, 1953)