Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Harry SIGMAN and Syl v. a Sigman, and Kay Feldman and Frances Feldman, Appellants,

PER CURIAM.

Careful consideration of the briefs and arguments of the parties convinces us that the trial in the court below was devoid of error. The questions presented were primarily those for the jury and the triers of the facts had ample evidence upon which to render their verdict. Accordingly, the judgment of the court below, 115 F. Supp. 366, will be affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SIGMAN v. VAN GILDER
(Oct 7, 1953)