MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION — Prohibition — Public Service Commission — Courts — Transmittal Order to Commission. — Relators filed petition for alternative writ of mandate and prohibition seeking clarification of transmittal order from court to commission as required by opinion in Public Service Commission of Indiana v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co., 232 Ind. 332 and upon examination of order and informal hearing of parties, court concludes transmittal order complied with mandate of this Court.
FLANAGAN, J.
This is a petition for alternative writ of mandate and prohibition seeking clarification of the transmittal order from the Marion Circuit Court to the Public Service Commission of Indiana, as required by the opinion of this court in the case of Public Service Commission of Indiana v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company (1953), 232 Ind. 332, 112 N.E.2d 751.
After careful examination of the involved transmittal order, and after informal hearing with all concerned parties represented, we conclude that the transmittal order complied with the mandate of our opinion.
Petition denied.
Gilkison, J., not participating.
NOTE. — Reported in 114 N.E.2d 879.