Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GERSH v. PEACOCK.

FELTON, J.

1. An amended petition to collect only the principal of notes which provide for interest at a rate of 6% per month is good as against a general demurrer where it does not affirmatively appear that the plaintiff was engaged in the small-loan business. Ellis v. Williams, 56 Ga. App. 181, 182 ( 192 S.E. 491); Craddock v. Woods, 60 Ga. App. 377, 380 ( 3 S.E.2d 924).

2. The fact that the violation of the usury laws is made a misdemeanor (Code, Ann., § 57-9901) does not alter or modify the civil law respecting usurious contracts. Code (Ann.) § 57-112; Croom v. Jordan, 20 Ga. App. 802 (2) ( 93 S.E. 538); Citizens Bank of Rome v. Hoyt Co., 25 Ga. App. 222 ( 102 S.E. 837).

The court did not err in overruling the general demurrer to the amended petition.

Judgment affirmed. Sutton, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

DECIDED OCTOBER 24, 1953.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GERSH v. PEACOCK
(Oct 24, 1953)