Public Utilities Commission — Powers — Order for protection of railway employees — Requiring railroad to desist from certain practice in yards — Appeal — Order not disturbed, when — Conflicting evidence.
Per Curiam.
The evidence in this case is conflicting. There is substantial evidence in the record to support a finding either in favor of or against the appellant. From an examination of the record, the order of the commission does not appear to be unreasonable or unlawful, and it is, therefore, affirmed.
Order affirmed.
MIDDLETON, TAFT, HART, ZIMMERMAN and STEWART, JJ., concur.
WEYGANDT, C.J., not participating.