Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

KIRKMAN v. STATE OF INDIANA.

CRIMINAL LAW — Conviction — Escape From Custody — Appeal. — Where, pending appeal, appellant escaped from custody and from jurisdiction, becoming a fugitive from justice, he cannot prosecute appeal.

FLANAGAN, J.

Appellant was convicted of grand larceny and this appeal follows. Pending appeal, appellant escaped from the Indiana Reformatory and subsequently absented himself from this State. It appears that he is now in custody of law enforcement officers of another State, being charged with the commission of new crimes and offenses allegedly committed subsequent to his escape here.

Where the appellant in a criminal case absents himself from the custody of the State and from its jurisdiction, and becomes a fugitive from justice, he cannot prosecute his appeal. Doren v. State (1914), 181 Ind. 314, 104 N.E. 500.

The mere fact that he has been captured and is held in another State cannot alter the above rule.

The Attorney General of Indiana has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal.

Motion sustained.

Gilkison, J., not participating.

NOTE. — Reported in 114 N.E.2d 878.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KIRKMAN v. STATE
(Oct 28, 1953)