Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARSHALL v. STATE.

POWELL, Presiding Judge.

Here the defendant was charged in the court of common pleas of Tulsa County with the unlawful possession of one-half pint of intoxicating liquor, with the intention to sell.

The possession of such quantity of liquor would not have been unlawful if for the personal use of the accused. Tit. 37 O.S. 1951 § 82[ 37-82]; Thomas v. State, 70 Okla. Cr. 404, 106 P.2d 836. On trial the State would have been required to produce competent evidence tending to show such intent. But the accused entered a plea of guilty, and was by the Court fined $75, and costs, and sentenced to serve thirty days in the county jail. Appeal has been perfected to this court, but brief in support of the petition in error has not been filed.

We find no error in the record, and the case is affirmed.

JONES and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MARSHALL v. STATE
(Dec 16, 1953)