Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

WILLIAM J. WOODROW v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY., Reported in 61 N.W.2d 240. Certiorari denied, 347 U.S. 935, 74 S.Ct. 630, 98 L. ed. 1085.

Judgment affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from a judgment. The case was here before on appeal from an intermediate order and our opinion filed July 3, 1953. Woodrow v. C. M. St. P. P. R. Co. 239 Minn. 530, 60 N.W.2d 49. For the reasons given in the previous opinion the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WOODROW v. MILWAUKEE
(Dec 4, 1953)