Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MITCHELL v. MERCER WATER CO. et al.

PER CURIAM.

The questions presented are (1) whether operating, maintenance and clerical employees employed interchangeably by a gas company and a water company, which furnish gas and water to industrial concerns for use in manufacturing products for interstate commerce and receive gas flowing from out of the State, are engaged "in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce" within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, and (2) whether such gas company or water company, operating as a public utility under the Public Utility Law of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is within the "retail or service establishment" exemption provided in Section 13(a)(2) of the Act. The United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania ruled in the affirmative on the first question and in the negative on the second, and we are in accord with its disposition for the reasons so well stated in the opinion of Chief Judge Gourley, 112 F. Supp. 656.

29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq.

66 P.S. § 1102.

The Order of the District Court will be affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MITCHELL v. MERCER WATER CO
(Dec 17, 1953)