PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the trial court's finding that defendant was indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $499.25.
Plaintiff testified that he had loaned $600 to defendant and to one Fisher and that the loan was not repaid on the date agreed upon. Subsequently defendant was employed by plaintiff as a real estate salesman, and the parties agreed that the loan would be repaid out of defendant's commissions. Plaintiff introduced into evidence a written statement, signed by defendant, which recited a part payment of the debt by defendant and acknowledged that $499.25 was the balance due. In his testimony defendant admitted the loan, but contended that he was only obligated to pay one-half of the amount and that Fisher was responsible for the balance.
This case is like many others where no principles of law are involved and the dispute is entirely a factual one. As has been said many times before, the trial court is in a much better position than we to reach a decision on such questions. It is sufficient to say in the present case that there was substantial evidence to support the finding of the trial court.
Affirmed.