Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. HOWARD PROSSER, Respondent, against WALTER B. MARTIN, as Warden of Attica State Prison, Appellant. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

Per Curiam.

The legality of a sentence may be tested in a habeas corpus proceeding. When an order in such a proceeding directs the sentencing court to resentence the relator, such court is under the necessity of resentencing him within a reasonable time. If it fails to do so, the District Attorney is under a duty to make an application pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act for an order to compel the sentencing court to proceed with such resentencing and pronounce judgment ( Matter of Hogan v. Bohan, 305 N.Y. 110). Here, we have been told, the term of imprisonment that might have been lawfully imposed has expired.

The order should be affirmed.

LEWIS, Ch. J., CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ., concur in Per Curiam opinion; VAN VOORHIS, J., concurs in the result.

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE EX REL. PROSSER v. MARTIN
(Jan 15, 1954)