Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Action by son against father for conversion — Resulting from father's action under son's power of attorney — Claimed misconduct of counsel — Statement that witness committed perjury — Court's refusal to declare mistrial not abuse of discretion, when — Jury admonished to disregard statement — Prejudice not disclosed by record — Evidence — Admissibility of summarized conclusions of expert witness — Summary drawn from 400 separate sources — Documents upon which predicated in evidence — Charge to jury — Applicability of two-issue rule.
Per Curiam.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and LAMNECK, JJ., concur.