Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF JOHN LOUIS VASZORICH, FOR A WRIT OFHABEAS CORPUS.

PER CURIAM.

Vaszorich appeals from an order of the Law Division denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus. He sought the writ upon the ground that the distribution to the jury panel outside his presence of the booklet discussed at pp. 112-115 of our opinion affirming his conviction upon his earlier appeal, State v. Vaszorich, 13 N.J. 99 (1953), certiorari denied 346 U.S. 900, 74 S.Ct. 219, 98 L.Ed. ___ (1953), denied him due process and fundamental fairness in his trial. The denial of the application as without merit is affirmed. See Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97, 54 S.Ct. 330, 78 L.Ed. 674 (1934).

HEHER, WACHENFELD and BURLING, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons stated on the disposition of the prior appeal, 13 N.J. 99.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices OLIPHANT, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 4.

For reversal — Justices HEHER, WACHENFELD and BURLING — 3.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE VASZORICH
(Mar 1, 1954)