Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

BUTTS v. BUTTS

David M. Spiegel, of Portland, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Lenske, Spiegel, Spiegel, Martindale and Bloom, of Portland.

Henry A. Buehner, of Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Yokom and Campbell and Schwenn and Brink, all of Portland.

MODIFIED.

LATOURETTE, C.J.

Plaintiff was granted a divorce from her husband on August 19, 1952. The decree contained a provision awarding to the defendant plaintiff's interest in partnership property belonging to the parties. This the court had no authority to do. Polanski v. Polanski, 193 Or. 429, 238 P.2d 739.

We cannot consider the other matters raised on the appeal for the reason that there is no transcript of testimony before us.

The decree will be modified deleting from the same that portion awarding to the defendant the plaintiff's interest in the partnership property aforesaid.

Costs to the plaintiff.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BUTTS v. BUTTS
(Mar 17, 1954)