AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MACITE CORP. v. DAVISON et al.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant corporation, as assignee-licensee of Letters Patent No. 2,078,264, sued appellees, alleging that the latter were manufacturing and selling the patented product without permission or right. Appellant asked an injunction and an accounting. The District Court, after hearing without a jury the evidence offered by plaintiff-appellant, dismissed the complaint.

After considering the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff-appellant, Higashi v. Shifflett, 1952, 90 U.S. App.D.C. 302, 195 F.2d 784, we have concluded that a prima facie case was not made out. The judgment must accordingly be

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MACITE CORP. v. DAVISON
(Apr 1, 1954)