Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE STATE, EX REL. PATTON, APPELLANT v. BAZZELL ET AL., BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF LAWRENCE COUNTY, ET AL., APPELLEES.

Elections — Primaries — Petition for candidate — Form and verification — Candidate for member of county central committee — Substantial compliance with statutory requirements.

Per Curiam.

This court is of the opinion that the board of elections in declaring the petition valid did not abuse its discretion. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals was not in error in sustaining the demurrer to the amended petition, and its judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and LAMNECK, JJ., concur.

TAFT, J., concurring.

In my opinion, the decision in this case cannot be reconciled with the decision and the reasons given therefor in State, ex rel. Kroeger, v. Leonard et al., Board of Elections of Summit County, 151 Ohio St. 197, 84 N.E.2d 910. However, in view of the reasons which Judge Stewart and I gave in expressing our dissent from the judgment rendered in that case, I have no difficulty in concurring in the judgment being rendered in the instant case. See also State, ex rel. Halpin, v. Hamilton County Board of Elections, ante, 281.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. BAZZELL
(Apr 23, 1954)