AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of the Claim of EUGENE BECHLER, Respondent, against HECHT'S et al., Appellants, and SPECIAL DISABILITY FUND, Respondent. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.

On October 15, 1949, claimant suffered an injury in the course of his employment which resulted in the amputation of his left index finger. In another previous accident claimant suffered injuries resulting in the amputation of the thumb and little finger of the left hand, for which he had received a schedule award of compensation for 45% loss of use of the left hand. The board has found, with evidence in the record to support the finding, that as a result of both accidents claimant suffered a 95% loss of the use of the left hand, and since claimant had already received compensation for a 45% loss of use of the left hand, made an award against appellants for 50% permanent loss of use of the left hand. Appellants filed a claim for reimbursement from the Special Disability Fund under subdivision 8 of section 15 of the Workmen's Compensation Law, for all payments beyond 104 weeks. This claim for reimbursement was allowed by the board. Appellants urge here that the limitations of subdivision 7 of section 15 are applicable, and that their liability for the later injury is limited to compensation for such injury "when considered by itself and not in conjunction with the previous disability". However, by chapter 872 of the laws of 1945 a proviso was added to subdivision 7, "except as hereinafter provided in subdivision eight of this section." There is nothing in subdivision 8 which limits the power of the board to make an award for permanent partial disability, and the limitations of subdivision 7 do not apply. It was within the province of the board under the facts in this case to make the award which it did. ( Matter of Conway v. Aluminum Brass Co., 279 App. Div. 82, affd. 304 N.Y. 571.) Award affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board. Foster, P.J., Bergan, Coon and Imrie, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF BECHLER v. HECHT'S
(Apr 24, 1954)