Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Municipal Courts — Jurisdiction — Violation of driver's license law outside city — Driving while intoxicated — Subdivision (c), Section 6296-30, General Code — County-wide jurisdiction of "court of record now having criminal jurisdiction" — Section 6296-16, General Code — Constitutionality — Jury — Selected from residents of city — Section 10, Article I, Constitution, not violated, when — Statutory construction — Repeal by implication not accomplished, when — Title of bill to contain one subject — Section 16, Article II, Constitution.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and LAMNECK, JJ., concur.