Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Bastardy proceeding — Justice of peace — Geographical area in which authority to be exercised — Section 10223, General Code — Statutory provision for benefit of those sued — May be waived, how — Appearance of accused and cross-examination of complainant — Jurisdiction of Common Pleas Court on appeal — Charge to jury — That failure of accused to testify may be considered — Accused's right to take deposition of complainant — Adequacy of award — For expenses of pregnancy, childbirth and support — Award of support from date of birth to adjudication — Trial court's refusal to award attorney fees to complainant — Evidence — Admissibility of enlarged photographs of child — Due process — Section 16, Article I, Constitution — Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution — Investiture of political power — Section 2, Article I, Constitution.
Per Curiam.
It is ordered and adjudged that these appeals as of right be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeals dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and LAMNECK, JJ., concur.
TAFT, J., not participating.