Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CHARLES R. LAMOREAUX,DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

In view of the admission by the prosecutor in his brief and at the oral argument as to the insufficiency of the proofs to support the indictment, the judgment below, 29 N.J. Super. 204, is affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. LAMOREAUX
(Sep 8, 1954)