Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STEINWAY ET AL. v. GRIFFITH CONSOLIDATED THEATRES, INC., ET AL.

DAVISON, Justice.

Except that this case is prosecuted for the use and benefit of the defendant Ritz Theatre, Inc., rather than Majestic Amusement Company, it is identical, as to parties, facts, and law, to cause Number 35,630, 273 P.2d 872, this day decided. Therefore, the opinion in said cause Number 35,630 is hereby adopted as the opinion herein.

Judgment is affirmed.

HALLEY, C.J., JOHNSON, V.C.J., and WELCH, CORN, ARNOLD, O'NEAL, WILLIAMS and BLACKBIRD, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STEINWAY v. GRIFFITH CONSOLIDATED THEATRES
(Sep 14, 1954)