Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Maurice C. Brigadier argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants ( Mr. Seymour Margulies, on the brief; Mr. Sol Schulman, attorney). Mr. Abraham J. Slurzberg argued the cause for defendant-respondent in companion case of Silverstein v. Dohoney, A-534/53. Mr. Irving I. Vogelman argued the cause for defendants-respondents; attorney for defendants-respondents Charles Rovegno and Frank Palmieri ( Mr. Francis P. Morley, attorney for defendant-respondent, Patrick Keane; Messrs. Gottlieb Gottlieb, attorneys for defendants-respondents, Frankie Nelson and Anthony Palmieri).
Judges
  • The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Maurice C. Brigadier argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants ( Mr. Seymour Margulies, on the brief; Mr. Sol Schulman, attorney). Mr. Abraham J. Slurzberg argued the cause for defendant-respondent in companion case of Silverstein v. Dohoney, A-534/53. Mr. Irving I. Vogelman argued the cause for defendants-respondents; attorney for defendants-respondents Charles Rovegno and Frank Palmieri ( Mr. Francis P. Morley, attorney for defendant-respondent, Patrick Keane; Messrs. Gottlieb Gottlieb, attorneys for defendants-respondents, Frankie Nelson and Anthony Palmieri).
Judges
  • The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).
See more information ...
Smart Summary

NATHAN SILVERSTEIN AND JULIAN SILVERSTEIN T/A SILCO CIGARETTE SERVICE, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. PATRICK KEANE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SCHETTINO, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

The argument on appeal of this case was consolidated by suggestion of counsel and with the approval of this court since many common questions of law and fact arising out of similar contracts were involved.

The issues and their determinations are fully set forth in the opinion filed under the companion case of Silverstein v. Dohoney, A-534/53 filed simultaneously herewith. 32 N.J. Super. 357 ( App. Div. 1954). The opinion comprehends this appeal.

Judgment is reversed, costs to abide the result of the retrial.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

SILVERSTEIN v. KEANE
(Oct 13, 1954)