Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Bribery of police officers — Joint indictment — Sufficiency of, where drawn in words of statute — Necessity for allegation of specific intent — Witnesses — Testimony of accomplice — Verdict — Form of — Consistency of, where one accused convicted and other acquitted — Evidence not same as to each accused — Charge to jury — On weight of testimony of accomplice — On necessity for corroboration — On conspiracy — On weight of character evidence — Motion for new trial — Due process — Section 16, Article I, Constitution — Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.
Per Curiam.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and LAMNECK, JJ., concur.