Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HARTSILL MARTIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee filed his motion in this Court to strike appellant's transcript and to dismiss the appeal. Appellant countered with a motion to strike appellee's motion. After hearing argument on both motions, it is the conclusion of this Court that appellant's motion to strike is without merit, and it is denied. Appellee's motion to dismiss the state's appeal is hereby granted for the reason that the state, as appellant, has proceeded in connection with this appeal without compliance with the basic rules of this Court concerning appellate procedure. Appellant's counsel here did not appear below.

Appellant's appeal is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

McGHEE, C.J., and SADLER, COMPTON, LUJAN and SEYMOUR, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. MARTIN
(Oct 11, 1954)