Supreme Court — Dismissal sua sponte — No debatable constitutional question involved — Municipal zoning ordinance — Uses to which property to be devoted — Council's consideration of economic rule of supply and demand — Attempted freezing of property because of possible future public need — Declaratory judgment action — Parties — Jurisdiction — Powers of municipalities — Section 3, Article XVIII, Constitution.
Per Curiam.
It is ordered and adjudged, sua sponte, that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, HART, STEWART and LAMNECK, JJ., concur.