Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RAWDIN v. CONNER et al.

DUCKWORTH, Chief Justice.

Where, as here, on the return of the remittitur in the case of Rawdin v. Conner, 210 Ga. 508 ( 81 S.E.2d 461), in which there was a judgment of reversal but no express direction of this court to the lower court, the case stands as reversed, and a new trial must be had on the issues therein raised since the case illegally terminated. The court did not err in denying the petitioner's motion to enter a final decree in his favor without a de novo trial. Code § 70-402; Schley v. Schofield Son, 61 Ga. 528; Fennell v. Fennell, 210 Ga. 153 ( 78 S.E.2d 524); American Associated Companies v. Vaughan, 210 Ga. 141 (2) ( 78 S.E.2d 43).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 13, 1954 — DECIDED OCTOBER 11, 1954.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RAWDIN v. CONNER
(Oct 11, 1954)